Data quality tools, and what to compare before you buy one
Data quality tools profile, fix and monitor the data your business runs on. They differ far more than their feature lists suggest. The questions that decide it are how they match records, whether a person reviews changes, and what you can prove afterwards.
Load a messy sample and watch it work
The same engine described below, running on your own machine. Nothing is uploaded and nothing is applied until you approve it.
1. Load a file
Your file is read on your own machine. Nothing is uploaded, so nothing can leak.
Or start from a messy sample
Status
Loading the sample file.
File: CRM contact export
Rows
--
Columns
--
Changes
--
Duplicate rows
--
Date formats
--
Blank or invalid emails
--
Load a file to see the diff
Drop a CSV or pick one of the messy samples. Every proposed change appears here as a line you approve or reject.
2. Review every change
Nothing approved yet.
Nothing is applied to your file until you approve it, and your original file is never modified.
Proposed changes
Original Proposed
Duplicate clusters
Merge or keep both
Want this on every file, and on bigger ones?
The free try is one file of your own. The Analyst plan cleans as many files as you need, up to 25MB and about 100,000 rows each, for $59 a month or $348 a year.
3. Take the result
The cleaned CSV contains only the changes you approved. The log lists every change, approved or not.
The five questions that separate them
1. How does it match?
Exact only, or fuzzy across several fields? Exact matching leaves most real duplicates in place.
2. Who approves a change?
A tool that rewrites cells on its own is fast until the first time it is wrong in a file you already sent out.
3. What is the record of it?
Ask for the audit log as an export. If the answer is a screen you can scroll, it will not survive an argument about a number.
4. Where does the data go?
Desktop, your browser, or a vendor server. This is the question your security team will ask first.
5. What does the price scale on?
Seats, records, or connected systems. A per-seat license is expensive for occasional users; volume pricing punishes a one-off big migration.
How the categories compare
| Spreadsheet | Open-source desktop | CRM-native app | Enterprise platform | DataUntangler | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Runs without installing | Yes | No | Yes, inside the CRM | Varies | Yes, in your browser |
| Fuzzy matching | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Row by row approval | No | Partly | Yes | Varies | Yes |
| Exportable audit log | No | No | Varies | Yes | Yes |
| Works on a raw CSV | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Time to first result | Minutes | An afternoon | Days | Weeks | Under a minute |
Category level comparison, not a product scorecard. Check any specific product against its own current documentation.
What a data quality program needs beyond a tool
Buying software does not fix data quality on its own. The teams that keep files clean agree on a definition of a duplicate, decide which system is the source of truth for each field, and clean on a schedule rather than in a panic before a migration. That is also why an analytics platform bought for the prep step tends to look oversized on renewal, which is the case set out on the Alteryx alternative page.
A tool helps with the last mile: doing the work quickly and leaving evidence. Look for one that produces an artifact you can attach to a ticket, not just a cleaner file. The two capabilities that decide most evaluations are fuzzy matching and entity resolution; the habit around them is data hygiene, and the data cleaning tool here is the part you can try before any of it.
Test every tool on the same file
The fastest way to compare data quality tools is to give each one the same ugly export and read what comes back. Build the test file from your own data, or copy the shape of the one below: an eight row customer master from an accounting system, with the faults a real one has. Then count what each tool found, what it changed without asking, and what it can show you afterwards.
We ran ours through this engine. It proposed 27 field fixes and one duplicate pair and flagged two rows it would not guess about. Sixteen of the fixes were currency values ($25,000.00 to 25000.00, 4812.5 to 4812.50), three were country spellings (USA, US and U.S. to United States), three were dates in four formats, two were states, one was a ZIP code that had lost its zero (4101 to 04101), one was an encoding repair (Bluebonnet Café to Café) and one was an email in capitals.
Write down the misses as well. Cedar & Stone Builders LLC and Cedar and Stone Builders had two different billing emails, and this engine did not propose them as one customer, because an ampersand against the word and plus a different email stays under its threshold. A good trial is one where you know exactly which pairs a tool misses before you buy it. The matching rules and their limits are written out on data deduplication tools.
What to score in a data quality tool trial
Keep the scorecard short and tied to the file. A feature list will tell you every product matches and standardizes; the file tells you how well, and what it costs you when it is wrong.
| Check | What to look for | What this engine did on the test file |
|---|---|---|
| Duplicates found | Same email in different case, legal suffixes, missing emails | Harbor Point Marine Inc. and Harbor Point Marine proposed on the shared email |
| Duplicates missed | Pairs you know are the same that it did not propose | Cedar & Stone and Cedar and Stone, different emails |
| Changes made without asking | Should be zero on a file that feeds a ledger | Zero, all 27 fixes were proposals |
| Values it refused to guess | Invalid emails and blanks flagged, not invented | granitepeak@yahoo flagged, one blank billing email counted |
| Evidence afterwards | A file you can attach to the ticket | CSV audit log with original, proposed, rule and decision |
| Where the file went | Your security review will ask | Nowhere, the demo runs in the browser |
Run the same file through every tool on your shortlist and fill in the last column for each one.
Who buys a data quality tool for files
This category is bought by the person who has to stand behind a number: a controller cleaning the customer master before an ERP move, a RevOps lead consolidating CRM exports after an acquisition, or an analyst whose dashboards are fed by spreadsheets from three teams. They do not need a platform with a steward queue; they need clean files this week and a record of every change.
The Analyst plan runs unlimited files of up to 25MB each, and Enterprise puts several people on one invoice with a DPA and purchase orders. See pricing, or run the demo above on your own export first.
A real engine run on an eight row customer master
| Column | Before | Proposed | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Credit Limit | $25,000.00 and 25000 | 25000.00 and 25000.00 | Currency format |
| Country | USA, US, U.S. | United States | Country standard |
| Last Invoice Date | 09/30/2025, Sep 12 2025, 8/1/2025 | 2025-09-30, 2025-09-12, 2025-08-01 | Date format |
| Billing State | Maine, Texas | ME, TX | State standard |
| Zip Code | 4101 | 04101 | Leading zero |
| Company | Bluebonnet Café | Bluebonnet Café | Encoding repair |
| Billing Email | granitepeak@yahoo | Not changed, flagged | Invalid address shape |
Every proposal waits for approval. The single duplicate pair, Harbor Point Marine, was proposed on the shared billing email with high confidence.
Three ways a tool evaluation reaches the wrong answer
The shortlist is usually decided by a demo and a feature grid. Neither one tells you what the tool does to your own export.
How this one is pricedThe demo runs on their file
A prepared dataset shows the matcher at its best. Ask to load your own export instead, and watch what it does to the columns your team actually argues about.
The feature grid hides the difference
Every product in the category ticks matching, cleansing and monitoring. What separates them is whether a person approves a change and whether anything records it.
The price scales on the wrong unit
Records, credits, connectors or seats. If the unit is not the one your work grows in, year two costs a multiple of year one for the same job.
What to get in writing before a pilot
How it matches, who approves a change, what the record of it is, where the data goes, and what the price scales on. Five answers, from every vendor on the list.
Questions about data quality tools
Is a data quality tool the same as a data catalog?
Where does DataUntangler fit?
How do I evaluate data quality tools?
What should a data quality tool fix automatically?
Do I need a data quality platform or a file tool?
Plans for when the file is bigger than the demo
Yearly billing saves 50 percent. There is no free plan, and no card is needed to use the browser demo above.
Yearly billing saves 50 percent, half the monthly price.
Switch to yearly and save 50 percent.
Analyst
Self-serveOne person with files to clean, as many as they like.
$29$59/mo
Billed $348 a year Billed monthly
- Unlimited files
- Files up to 25MB, about 100,000 rows
- Exact and fuzzy duplicate detection
- Dates, numbers, currencies, encoding and casing fixed
- Every change reviewable before you download
- Cleaned CSV and a change log, both downloadable
- Runs in your browser: files never leave your machine
- Email support
Enterprise
Several people on one invoice, a DPA on request, priced per seat.
$49$98/seat/mo
Billed $588 a seat a year, from 2 seats ($1,176) Billed monthly per seat, from 2 seats ($196)
- Everything in Analyst
- Several people on one invoice
- DPA on request
- Invoicing and purchase orders
- A named contact for support
Payment is by card through our payment provider, monthly or yearly, and you can cancel from your account at any time. The free try is one file of your own, up to 5MB, in the browser demo. Already paid? Sign in.
Related pages
- Data Cleaning Software for CSV and Excel Files
- Entity Resolution Software for Customer Records
- Data Hygiene for Contact Lists and CRM Records
- Data Cleaning Services vs Doing It In House
- Fuzzy Matching Tool for Names and Companies
- Excel Data Cleaning Tool Without Formulas
- Data Deduplication Tools for CSV and Excel
- Address Standardization and Cleansing Software
- CRM Data Cleansing Before Import or Migration
- Salesforce Deduplication and Data Cleaning Tool
- HubSpot Deduplication to Merge Duplicate Contacts
- Zoho CRM Deduplication to Merge Duplicate Contacts
- Pipedrive Duplicate Contacts Deduplication Tool
- NetSuite CSV Import With Clean and Deduped Files
- Data Scrubbing Software and Tools for CSV Files
- Mailchimp Duplicate Contacts Across Audiences
- Constant Contact Duplicate Contacts and Emails
- Klaviyo Duplicate Profiles and Merge Profiles
- ActiveCampaign Duplicate Contacts and Merge Contacts
- QuickBooks Online Merge Vendors and Customers From One List
- Merge Customers in QuickBooks Desktop and Merge Vendors
- Salesforce Merge Accounts in Bulk from One Reviewed List
- Salesforce Merge Contacts and Merge Leads From One Reviewed List
- HubSpot Merge Contacts and Companies From a Reviewed List
Clean the file, and be able to show what you changed
Try the demo on your own CSV first. It runs in your browser, it costs nothing, and no card is required.
No card required. Your file never leaves your computer.